Monday, May 19, 2014

Science Vs. Religion

Today, I thought I'd just post the content of a few emails I exchanged with my cousin a few years ago.

David wrote to me:

Greetings Nathan,

So lately I have been thinking about the debate between science and religion. Why is it that an atheist uses science to argue the irrelevancy of God? And more importantly why in the world does it work so well?

First of all, what is science? So far I have determined that science can be defined as the study and explanation of the universe we live in. Basically it tries to understand a set of facts in the most reasonable way. Science uses a method known as the scientific method. Science asks questions and seeks to grow. Science can be wrong without getting upset; in fact it’s always trying to prove itself wrong. In the end Science is both the greatest and least likely threat to Christianity.

Since science is composed of facts, every scientific theory can be broken down to its underlying factual nature. Its fractals are factual! So the biggest example would be the theory of Evolution. Is the earth millions of years old and who cares? Personally I am convinced that the earth is millions of years old and I don’t care. However, I see so often that it matters a majority of Christians, and not only many Christians but many people who previously were Christians and presently are not because they were converted to “Science” the unreligious religion.

So I asked myself: Given a situation where X is true, what would the effect of X have on my relationship with God. [Where X is a specific debated scientific theory]. In this case I substitute Evolution for X and the answer I get is: No effect. Now I ask the same question of you. Given a situation where Evolution is true, what would the effect of Evolution have on your belief in God? Would it have an effect?

Evolution is just one theory. But let’s break it into facts: it is a fact that the rock that makes up our planet is old. It is a fact that dinosaurs lived millions of years ago. It is a fact that the light from stars hitting our planet is millions of years old. It is a fact that our sun has used up 5 billion years worth of its fuel, it is a fact that species change over time, and it is a fact that at one point in earths past there was only slime in the oceans. Suddenly when a Christian says: “the earth has only been around for 6 thousand years” I begin to question said Christians education and seriously doubt their sanity.

So when I am in doubt I search the scriptures. What I found was this: In genesis God says “let the earth bring forth seed and green stuff” “let the waters bring forth water animals” “let the earth bring forth animals”. So far being a Christian does not contradict the facts. So far I can believe strongly in my God without doubt. Suddenly I realized something, the facts that make up our planet and even help make the theory of evolution ultimately point to the amazing complexity and intelligence of my God.

And so I have written this long letter to let you know that I value your input. Thanks for the feedback that I know you will fill my inbox with.

David
 
Then I (Nathan) wrote:


I believe that science, as you define it here, is not a threat to the "knowledge of God," truth is truth - simple.

"Christianity" however, will, by and large, be threatened by science, again, as you define it here so well, because science is as it does, it seeks the truth even if it means proving itself wrong. So much of Christianity, as it is today, is full of falsehoods, misconceptions, misinterpretations etc. So, science, in its essence, would destroy it, or rather the idea of it, to be technically correct, and remake it until the idea and ideals of Christianity are congruent with the knowledge of God; so far, they're not.

The reason, I believe, that when atheists use science to bruise the idea of Christianity and it works so unbelievably well is that while Christians may have reason to believe in God, they are all too often lacking in the KNOWLEDGE of God and so fall prey to those atheists who use what seems to be sense and reason but is only a semblance.

As for the theory of evolution, I personally believe that it's false. I DO believe that the Earth is very old and all that, but there hasn't yet been any evidences or proofs discovered that support the evolution theory that are concrete.

Of course, when I mention the theory of evolution, I specifically am referring to the theory that all life began with basic amino acids etc. that, by incredible happenstance, came together and started to change into complex and more complex organisms over a great deal of time and so on and so forth.

I don't really know EXACTLY how all life came to be, but I do know that it was not random or by chance. Jesus did it all, He had a plan, He created humans in the image of Himself and His Father and it was a miracle, miracle being defined as something happening that's either too unlikely or completely impossible so as not to be expected to happen, ever.

 And David finally wrote:

Fascinating. I totally agree with these words. The words incredible happenstance stick out to me here. To me and I can see for you as well, the methods do not matter. We know that God created the world, and to have faith in the face of overwhelming evidence is simple, for the methods that God used are not important, only the realization that God is the one who used the methods.

The first message you wrote was very well written. The fault lies with Christianity. Indeed, when I traveled on the train to Chicago I met many very right-wing Christians who were in general uneducated. Not only in just basic knowledge (My people perish for lack of knowledge), but in what the bible itself teaches. I find it astonishing the number of people who believe wholeheartedly in Lucifer and his army of fallen angels, and yet they are surprised when I point out to them that the work Lucifer was only used twice in the bible and in one place it was translated as "Day star" (2 Peter) and was referring to Jesus himself.

When I say this generally their eyes glaze over and they stop listening, so its not like my talking to them has done anything good. 

And that's it (typos and all). 

 
Please let me know what you think. God bless you until next time!

Nathan

No comments:

Post a Comment